Affirmative Action needs to focus more on the new and less on the past; it needs to evolve to support the current society we all live in As strange as it seems, this type of situation occurs everyday, and many wonder why the policy is legal.
Opponents of affirmative action say that the battle for equal rights is over, and that requiring quotas that favor one group over another is un-American. The focus of current research is an attempt to either justify or deny the use of affirmative action within current practices through various higher education institutions, and though any one person could potentially be swayed to side with the rationale to maintain its use or disregard, the facts are quite clear that the future of this practice is unclear What does that teach him.
These policies are under attack today because of the unfairness toward the more qualified people. Affirmative of action principally increased the participation of women and minorities in three major fields: Education, employment and in the awarding of government contracts This eventually trickled down into the Educational system which it eventually lost its way.
Affirmative action gives preferential treatment to minorities in admission to universities or employment in government and business Messerli.
Similarly, the judiciary has held its own interpretation on what affirmative action that has commonly been used the making of most rulings in courts Glazer,